Pages

Friday, February 18, 2011

Imbecile Democrat Whines About ObamaCare Being Called ObamaCare

I'm starting to think these Democrats are suffering a collective nervous breakdown. That or an extended temper tantrum.
House Republicans and Democrats started Friday morning's debate over whether to defund last year's healthcare law, and as part of this debate sparred over whether members should be allowed to call that law "ObamaCare."

After two House Republicans called it "ObamaCare," Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) asked the chairman whether these "disparaging" remarks should be allowed on the House floor.

"That is a disparaging reference to the president of the United States; it is meant as a disparaging reference to the president of the United States, and it is clearly in violation of the House rules against that," she said.
Gee, it almost sounds as if she's ashamed to be associated with ObamaCare.
The indirect warning had no effect on Republicans. Rep. Denny Rehberg (Mont.), who sponsored the amendment to defund the law, said he refers to it as ObamaCare and said, "You would think he wants his name attached to his signature legislation.

"So we call it what it is," he continued. "It is ObamaCare. It's a travesty. It is big government. It is not controlling healthcare costs, and it needs to be repealed and today we're going to try to defund it to the best of our ability. And if we're not successful this time, we're going to try again and again and again until we either have a Senate that's willing to pass it or a president that understands that we cannot do this to the American people."

2 comments:

  1. Rep. Denny Rehberg (Mont.), who sponsored the amendment to defund the law, said he refers to it as ObamaCare and said, "<span>You would think he wants his name attached to his signature legislation</span>.

    <span>"So we call it what it is,"</span> he continued. "<span>It is ObamaCare. It's a travesty</span>. It is big government. It is not controlling healthcare costs, and it needs to be repealed and today we're going to try to defund it to the best of our ability. And if we're not successful this time, we're going to try again and again and again until we either have a Senate that's willing to pass it or a president that understands that we cannot do this to the American people."



    AMEN!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. FrankG7:28 AM

    I had thought Wasserman-Schultz was a gynecological condition defined by an itchy smelly cooze. Now I find there was some basis in my error

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.