Showing posts with label Tom Lantos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Lantos. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Maybe They'd Prefer Political Whore

Congressman Tom Lantos (D-CA) has caused a royal shitstorm to break out --- for telling the truth.
Just as trans-Atlantic relations appeared to be nearly normal again, a top US congressman stirred controversy Tuesday by saying former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's close business ties to Russia amounted to "political prostitution."

The remarks invoked the divisive atmosphere of four years ago, as the US prepared to go to war in Iraq unilaterally after Western Europe refused to support US President George W Bush.

For Congressman Tom Lantos, a Holocaust survivor who chairs the House of Representatives foreign affairs committee, that rebuff apparently still stings.

Speaking at the dedication ceremony for a victims of communism memorial in Washington, Lantos attacked both Schroeder and former French president Jacques Chirac for failing to support the United States in its fight against what he called the next wave of tyranny - Islamic fascism - after all the US had done in saving Europe from Nazism and communism.

Lantos said their exit from office opened the way to a better era of trans-Atlantic relations, adding he would like to call Schroeder "a political prostitute, now that he's taking big cheques from (Russian President Vladimir) Putin."

"But the sex workers in my district objected," he quipped.

His remarks provoked gasps not only of surprise from the crowd of survivors of communism gathered for the dedication in Washington, but also of anger in Germany.
I can't help but wonder if that anger is fueled in part by the inconvenient truth that Lantos is a Jew?

Now, it's nice that Congressman Lantos has called out the French and Germans for their lack of action. However, Lantos was a member of the recent Pelousi tour that included a visit to Damascus to confab with human rights activist Bashir Asshat. As such, Mr. Lantos bears a degree of responsibility for the results of that visit.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Surrendering The War on Terror

Adam Brodsky points out the obvious today. Many seem to want to give up the fight against the Islamofascist monsters without acknowledging that the enemy is not quite ready to stop fighting.

Ever.
The War on Terror is over. Or, at least, the West seems to be declaring it so.

We've had enough.

There's been too much hostility. Too many lives lost; too many civil liberties trampled on. Too many Muslims offended.

So we're pulling out. We'll just have to "dialogue" more - and fight less.

Who sees any chance of winning militarily, anyhow? We'll have to work things out "politically" instead - offering "flexibility" and a willingness to compromise with the enemy.

Just one little problem: The enemy has yet to sign on to ending the war.

They have no desire to compromise or stand down - and no intention to do so.

We may declare the war over - but they won't. Ever.
Therein lies the main obstacle to ever achieving peace in our lifetimes. We face a bloodthirsty enemy hellbent on destroying us while simultaneously battling the left and the media who think if we just talk to them enough, they'll understand we all want to sing Kumbaya and they will lay down their arms.

Never going to happen.
They say so openly. Repeatedly. And backs up their words with horrific proof.

Still, we pretend - at our peril - that we can just withdraw and declare the war over. Consider the West's record of the past few weeks:

* Democrats keep setting surrender dates in Iraq, even as they fail to provide funding for U.S. troops there. As if our retreat won't plunge the Middle East into disaster - with consequences for America soon to follow.

* House Speaker Nancy Pelosi treats with Syria, a chief sponsor of terror. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) says he's dying to yuk it up with the thugs in Iran.

* Tehran, meanwhile, holds 15 British sailors hostage for two weeks - and Britain, once the greatest naval power on earth, does . . . nothing.

* Italy gets Afghanistan to release five Taliban captives in exchange for an Italian journalist, signaling that kidnappings pay. (After the Italian's released, the butchers slit the throat of his Afghan colleague.)

* Congress greenlights millions in funding for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas - even though he has partnered with Hamas, a ruthless terror organization.

* President Bush brags about "progress" in blocking foreigners from illegally entering the country, even though - five years after 9/11 - tens of thousands continue to hop the border every month.

* Mike Bloomberg - the mayor of the city where the World Trade Center towered, until terrorists siezed [sic] those aircraft on 9/11 - says there's nothing wrong with retaining a city human-rights commissioner who's actively aiding the attempt by "the flying imams" to deter Americans from reporting suspicious behavior.

* A report in Britain says teachers there are scrapping lessons on the Holocaust and the Crusades, so as not to offend Muslims who deny the historical record.

* A former U.S. national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, argues in The Washington Post that damage caused merely by the phrase "War on Terror" is "infinitely greater than any wild dreams entertained by the fanatical perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks."

* Iran announces (maybe falsely, but who knows?) that it can now enrich uranium at an industrial pace - and the world yawns.

* Israel considers the release of scores of Palestinian prisoners, even ones with blood on their hands, in exchange for an Israeli soldier.

These strong signs that we're losing the will to fight are sure to encourage terrorists and boost the odds that they'll launch new strikes against us.
If a Democrat takes the White House in 2008, no doubt he or she will signal further willingness to have dialogue with our enemies, who will only laugh and attack us further.

We must unleash the full fury of our military might against the enemy worldwide and utterly destroy them. Until we do, we face a bleak future.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Pelosi, Lantos Want to Go to Iran

Sucking up to Bashar Assad was bad enough, but now Nancy Pelosi and Tom Lantos want to go have dialogue with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They really are out of their minds. Their trip to Syria wasn't disastrous enough, now they want to compound the error?
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Tom Lantos, D-San Mateo, just back from a trip to Syria that sparked sharp criticism from Republicans and the Bush administration, suggested Tuesday that they may be interested in taking another diplomatic trip - to open a dialogue with Iran.

The Democratic speaker from San Francisco and Lantos, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, were asked at a press conference in San Francisco Tuesday whether on the heels of their recent trip to the Middle East they would be interested in extending their diplomacy in the troubled region with a visit to Iran.

"Speaking just for myself, I would be ready to get on a plane tomorrow morning, because however objectionable, unfair and inaccurate many of (Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's) statements are, it is important that we have a dialogue with him,'' Lantos said. "Speaking for myself, I'm ready to go -- and knowing the speaker, I think that she might be.''
These folks really are so dangerously naive, thinking they can reason with lunatics who will play them for the fools they are.
Lantos noted that "with the speaker's support,'' he has co-sponsored legislation in the House that calls for making available to all countries -- including Iran -- nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under international oversight by establishing a "nuclear fuel bank."

"So if the Iranian president says that he is developing (nuclear material) for peaceful purposes, we are assisting him in that process,'' said Lantos, who anticipated the legislation could pass as early as May.
Speaking of the Syrian trip, check out this commercial from the Republican Jewish Coalition. Priceless.

UPDATE: More from Allahpundit .