Barack, Sit Down and Shut Up

And only answer the question after raising your hand and being called on.

Here is a link to radio interview that Barack gave right after the Iowa caucuses and his response to what he would do as Commander Surrenderer in Chief.

Bring our troops home from Iraq at the beginning.

That's the ticket, Barack. Snatch defeat from the jaws off victory. You only leave the battlefield in in one of two ways. Either victorious or in defeat. You just don't check out in the middle of a war as blogger Blackfive has pointed out numerous times.

Roland Martin: If you are elected what is the very first thing that you focus on as Commander in Chief of this country?

Barack Obama: Well, we will call in the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I will give them a new assignment and that is to bring our troops home in a careful, responsible way, but to end this occupation in Iraq. I will call in my Secretary of State and initiate the diplomacy that's needed to make sure that exit is accompanied by negotiations between the Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds.

He goes on to cite a lack of progress from the central government in Iraq. You stupid, ignorant, pandering, juvenile acting idiot!

He shows a complete lack of knowledge of all things related to how how power is derived, gained and maintained in the Middle East. Everything starts at the local level and moves to the central level not the other way around.

You will not force the central government into action, and he doesn't define what that action is, maybe a spring break like our congress takes, by removing our forces. It is not the presence of our troops that prevents the central government from doing more then it has, and it has done quite a bit.

If Obama would quit reading the NY Times are start reading the Arab newspapers and the weekly briefings from the Central Command in Iraq he might know that. No it is easier to play the whiny little baby who is going to bring the troops home. That is a load of crap. Always has been. Who are you trying to pander to with this shit?

It ain't those who are fighting the battle and restoring the country. Sure it sounds nice to those left here but even most of them realize that what we are doing over there is not only necessary but important as well. Besides why should it be such a big deal about bringing the troops home when less then 1% of the population of this country is affected directly by what happens over there? Are you trying to get the military vote?

For anybody that doesn't have somebody in the military what difference will it make in your life if they stay or come home? Is there anything different in your life since we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq? Name one thing that you do today that is different then what you did before we went.

Have you sacrificed anything? NO, you haven't and that is because that very select group of individuals who have volunteered to go fight this fight make sure that your life isn't disturbed.

Take your damn faux sympathy or some sort of pathetic saying about bringing the troops home and shove it.

Durn right I am fired up over this nonsense. There isn't a single candidate on the Democrat side that can look past the groups they are pandering to, to see the long range effects of what they are saying. I actually don't think the Democrats care what happens in the Middle East and only wish to respond to terrorists after they have carried out attacks on our soil again.

Oh sure they will be there with their lawyers and their investigations but it will be a little too late for those that are the victim of such an attack.

Nature abhors a vacuum, and a vacuum is exactly what would be created in Iraq if we leave, and apparently what Obama has as far as understanding what is happening in the Middle East.