Moveon and their cousins in crime have decided to pursue a new tactic in their anti war campaign. Now instead of trying to withdraw the troops or stop the funding they now want to prevent a long term commitment to Iraq as proposed by many in the administration as well as the Iraqi's.
What are the Democrat presidential candidates going to do now? They have spent all that time, money, and hot air on trying to be the candidate who can get our troops out the fastest and now their supporters are changing horses. There is no doubt the Dems bow down at the altar of moveon as has been proven on more then one case. That George Soros money is just too good to turn down.
So in the coming days watch for the Dem front runners to get more nuanced and try to backtrack on their "all is lost" mantra and withdrawal at all costs rhetoric and now morph into the new strategy outlined by these groups of no long term commitment.
UPDATE: And right on cue the old gray lady, the New York Times picks up the cause.
UPDATE II: The hits just keep coming from the NY Times. Via Pajamas Media. And somewhere in the background I can hear Pat Benatar.
No comments:
Post a Comment