Of Course: Michael Moore Praises Army Traitor

Only in the twisted mind of Michael Moore can a traitor to his country be praised for his courage.

ilmmaker Michael Moore is praising an Army private suspected of releasing classified war records to WikiLeaks and said he would contribute to his defense.

Moore tells The Associated Press in an interview that he considers Pfc. Bradley Manning a courageous patriot for exposing what Moore called "war crimes."

The Oscar-winning filmmaker said Thursday he will contribute to a legal defense fund for the 22-year-old former intelligence analyst, who faces up to 52 years in prison.

Apparently Moore isn't the only idiot supporting the traitor.

In Memory of 9/11, NY Times Reveals More National Security Secrets

Way to observe a somber anniversary, folks. Thanks for tipping off the bad guys.

President Bush secretly approved orders in July that for the first time allow American Special Operations forces to carry out ground assaults inside Pakistan without the prior approval of the Pakistani government, according to senior American officials.

The classified orders signal a watershed for the Bush administration after nearly seven years of trying to work with Pakistan to combat the Taliban and Al Qaeda, and after months of high-level stalemate about how to challenge the militants’ increasingly secure base in Pakistan’s tribal areas.

American officials say that they will notify Pakistan when they conduct limited ground attacks like the Special Operations raid last Wednesday in a Pakistani village near the Afghanistan border, but that they will not ask for its permission.

“The situation in the tribal areas is not tolerable,” said a senior American official who, like others interviewed for this article, spoke on condition of anonymity because of the delicate nature of the missions. “We have to be more assertive. Orders have been issued.”

The new orders reflect concern about safe havens for Al Qaeda and the Taliban inside Pakistan, as well as an American view that Pakistan lacks the will and ability to combat militants. They also illustrate lingering distrust of the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies and a belief that some American operations had been compromised once Pakistanis were advised of the details.

May as well just cancel it all now since our good friends at the old grey hag have divulged the secrets.

Question: How long until Barack Obama takes credit for this? I give it a day.

Democrats Dismiss Petraeus Report

You can call him Dick

So you ask how they can dismiss the report before it's reported?

They're Democrats. They don't need to explain themselves.

As if you needed any confirmation they're working for defeat, look no further.

Of course, let's not question their patriotism; that hurts more than humiliating defeat.

Dems already dismissing Iraq war report

Congressional Democrats are trying to undermine U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus' credibility before he delivers a report on the Iraq war next week, saying the general is a mouthpiece for President Bush and his findings can't be trusted.

"The Bush report?" Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin said when asked about the upcoming report from Gen. Petraeus, U.S. commander in Iraq.

"We know what is going to be in it. It's clear. I think the president's trip over to Iraq makes it very obvious," the Illinois Democrat said. "I expect the Bush report to say, 'The surge is working. Let's have more of the same.' "

Wow, if only we were all blessed with such mindreading powers as Little Dick Durbin.

The top Democrats — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California — also referred to the general's briefing as the "Bush report."

We see where this is going.

Forget all the improvements on the grounds, forget the reduced casualty rate, forget the fact we're killing Al Qaeda in large numbers.

The Democrats long ago made up their mind that sacrificing the best interests of the United States solely to gain more political power is their primary goal.

Yes, I do question their patriotism.

Pelosi Sucks Up to Dictator

Naturally, Nancy Pelosi and the AP call this fascist thug President.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that Syrian President Bashar Assad assured her of his willingness to engage in peace talks with Israel.

Pelosi said she and other members of her congressional delegation raised with Assad their concern about militants crossing from Syria into Iraq, as well the Israeli soldiers kidnapped by the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and the Palestinian group Hamas.

The Californian Democrat spoke to reporters shortly after talks with Assad at the end of a two-day visit to Syria, which the White House has criticized as undermining American efforts to isolate the hard-line Arab country.

She said the delegation gave the Syrian leader a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert whose essence was that Israel was ready to hold peace talks with Syria.

She did not say more about the message, but Israel has previously made such talks conditional on Syria's cutting off its support for hardline Palestinian groups and Hezbollah.

"We were very pleased with the assurances we received from the president that he was ready to resume the peace process. He's ready to engage in negotiations for peace with Israel," Pelosi said.

She's even dumber than I thought. Sure, she's really concerned about terrorists crossing into Iraq from Syria. So why the hell is she there groveling before this piece of garbage?

Andrew Cochran asks a logical question:

Why Are American Officials Meeting With Terrorists' Supporters?

Creeping Toward Treason

Frank Gaffney takes the Democrats to task and they're richly deserving of the scorn. Read the whole piece, but this part sums it up quite succinctly.

It is highly ironic that many of those most critical of President Bush for not having a "plan" for post-invasion Iraq are conspicuously quiet about what would happen after their plan for retreat is adopted. They seem irresponsibly unconcerned about the prospect that, after America capitulates, there would be genocidal mayhem in Iraq, creation of a new safe-haven for terrorism there and a general emboldening of our enemies around the world.

Such behavior is even more intolerable when compounded by today's "agitators" demeaning the troops they profess to support -- notably, by comparing them to Nazis, terrorists, rapists and the killing fields -- and threatening to deny them (through one device or another) the means required to accomplish their mission. In the offing are new legislative initiatives aimed at limiting the authority given to the president in 2002 to achieve Iraq's liberation and tying his hands with respect to the growing threat from Iran -- even that the regime in Tehran is currently posing to our troops fighting next door in Iraq.

These critics, particularly members of Congress, must be held accountable for such destructive dissent. Our enemies believe their strategy for achieving a political victory by wearing down the United States is succeeding. They are redoubling their efforts as they perceive the rising power of irresponsible anti-war "agitators."

Ted Kennedy, Traitor

I had noticed several stories recently about Ted Kenendy and his shady dealings with the former Soviet Union during the Reagan Administration, but the story never gets any traction due to the overwhelming liberal media bias in this country.

Well, I heard Roger Hedgecock, sitting in behind the Golden EIB Microphone today, mention Cold War contacts, a piece by a former CIA analyst in today's Washington Times, so hopefully the story will be picked up by more outlets.

Hedgecock made a point to note how the current behavior of the Democrats undermining the Bush Administration in the Iraq war isn't so much news as it's a pattern of behavior going back much further, and this story is more than ample evidence of the perfidy committed by the drunken sot from Massachusetts.

In 1983, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy offered to help the Soviets mount a public-relations offensive in the United States. This propaganda attack would target President Reagan and his policies. These are the same policies that eventually ended the Cold War and reduced the possibility of nuclear annihilation. This charge was made by Paul Kengor in his book "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism."

This new book adds to research done by Herb Romerstein, Yevgenia Albats, Vladimir Bukovsky, Pavel Stroilov and others. They all indicate that Mr. Kennedy felt that any bad relations between the United States and the Soviet Union were the sole fault of Mr. Reagan and that talk of a Soviet military threat was nonsense. These articles seem to validate reports that were first published by Vasili Mitrokhin — the former KGB historian who secretly copied sensitive KGB files and released them after the fall of the Soviet Union.

According to this research and released KGB papers, Mr. Kennedy felt that the booming economy during Mr. Reagan's presidency made him popular — and thus a difficult target for Democratic criticism. Because of this, Mr. Kennedy reportedly felt that Mr. Reagan's only weakness was in foreign policy. Here, the articles say Mr. Kennedy felt the Soviets might be of assistance, if Mr. Kennedy and the Democrats could get the ear of the general-secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Guarantee this: Should the story get picked up by a wider audience, the left will simply circle the wagons around their bloated icon, and question whether the author really exists, since he penned the piece under a pseudonym.

They won't have any problem "outing" a CIA analyst in this case.

Useful Idiots Gather in DC

They love the sound of their own voices. So do our enemies.

Vietnam War protest icon Jane Fonda took the stage in her first anti-war demonstration in decades as tens of thousands massed to demand that Congress cut off funds for the Iraq war.

"I haven't spoken at an anti-war rally for 34 years," said Fonda, whose visit to Hanoi in 1972 outraged many pro-Vietnam War Americans and damaged her reputation as an actress.

"But silence is no longer an option," she said to cheering protesters.

Silence? When have these morons ever shut up?

Here's a nice case of child abuse. I bet they feel really good putting this young skull full of mush up there to mimic their vile propaganda.

Standing on her toes to reach the microphone, 12-year-old Moriah Arnold told the crowd: "Now we know our leaders either lied to us or hid the truth. Because of our actions, the rest of the world sees us as a bully and a liar."

The sixth-grader from Harvard, Mass., the youngest speaker on the National Mall stage, organized a petition drive at her school against the war.

Oh, and what's all this talk about "just poop"?