Prominent Climate Hoaxer: 'Denial Industry is Out to Dupe the Public'

Talk about a massive case of projection. A guy who's at the forefront of the climate-change scam has the gall to make the claim the "denial industry" is out to hoodwink the public.

It doesn't get any funnier than this.

When you survey the trail of wreckage left by the climate emails crisis, three things become clear. The first is the tendency of those who claim to be the champions of climate science to minimise their importance. Those who have most to lose if the science is wrong have perversely sought to justify the secretive and chummy ethos that some of the emails reveal. If science is not transparent and accountable, it's not science.

I believe that all supporting data, codes and programmes should be made available as soon as an article is published in a peer-reviewed journal. That anyone should have to lodge a freedom of information request to obtain them is wrong. That the request should be turned down is worse. That a scientist suggests deleting material that might be covered by that request is unjustifiable. Everyone who values the scientific process should demand complete transparency, across all branches of science.

The second observation is the tendency of those who don't give a fig about science to maximise their importance. The denial industry, which has no interest in establishing the truth about global warming, insists that these emails, which concern three or four scientists and just one or two lines of evidence, destroy the entire canon of climate science.

OK, so if it's a mere "one or two" lines of evidence and "three or four" scammers, how does that translate to a "trail of wreckage"?

Uh, Mr. Monbiot, it is because the "evidence" has been hidden that your world is crumbling around you. Pointing fingers at those who question the junk science and playing make believe about "one or two" lines of evidence isn't going to wash away the stain.

As to the "denial industry" having no interest in establishing the "truth" about mythical global warming you are indeed correct. There is no global warming, so therefore there is no truth to establish. What we're more interested in is exposing the fraud that you and your co-conspirators have perpetrated on the public.

When I use the term denial industry, I'm referring to those who are paid to say that man-made global warming isn't happening. The great majority of people who believe this have not been paid: they have been duped. Reading Climate Cover-Up, you keep stumbling across familiar phrases and concepts which you can see every day on the comment threads. The book shows that these memes were planted by PR companies and hired experts.

Oh, and we don't see familiar phrases repeated every day by the climate scammers?

Can we project any more here, Mr. Moonbat?

Yup, we're all just a bunch of unwitting dupes, and the brainwashed public and schoolkids who have the daylights scared out them them on a daily basis have just been inculcated with the truth. No, they're not dupes, just messengers of the greater truth, whatever that is today.