Monday, June 16, 2008

Gaza 'Journalists' Demand Answers From Israel

Try not to snicker too much while you're reading this one. Reuters doesn't even try to pretend it's a news story and omits a byline for this absurd propaganda effort.
Journalists in the Gaza Strip held a symbolic work stoppage on Monday as part of a protest to demand that Israel explain why its troops killed a Reuters cameraman in the Palestinian enclave two months ago to the day.

The demonstration, during which journalists laid down their cameras, came on a day when U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will unveil a memorial dedicated to journalists killed while reporting on wars around the world.
What does that have to do with this story? Are they portraying this guy as some heroic war correspondent?

Please.
Reuters Middle East Managing Editor Mark Thompson said: "We are deeply disappointed that the Israeli army has failed to provide an account of the circumstances in which Fadel Shana was killed by a tank shell on April 16, nor any evidence to support its claim that they could not identify him as a journalist.

"Fadel had taken all reasonable precautions while filming that day and the refusal of the Israeli army to work with the media on safety issues since his death has forced us and others to curtail reporting in Gaza."

Eight other civilians were killed along with Shana.

A spokesman for Prime Minister Ehud Olmert denied Israel, whose army has warned journalists that they work in Gaza at their own risk, was seeking to discourage coverage there.

"We urge journalists to use common sense and to look after themselves. But the idea that journalists should not go to Gaza is not the position of the government," spokesman Mark Regev said during a tour for journalists of Israeli towns hit by rockets fired by Islamist militants in the Gaza Strip.

"We have expressed regret and the army is conducting an investigation. It's a tragedy," Regev said. "There was no identification that he was a journalist. Had it been clear he was a journalist, the shell would not have been fired."

No comments: