The Fix Is In: Goracle Likely to Get 'Peace' Prize

The Nobel Peace Prize was rendered meaningless when terrorist Yasser Arafat was awarded it back in the 1990's, and it became an absolute joke when the blithering idiot Jimmy Carter "earned" it for enabling North Korea to go nuclear.

Now the pinheads on the committee appear ready to give it to gasbag Al Gore for his endless promulgation of propaganda.

As RadicalRon noted, there are far more deserving candidates, but why would the committee honor a Holocaust survivor when they can perpetuate the myth of global warming?

Former Vice President Al Gore and other campaigners against climate change lead experts' choices for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, an award once reserved for statesmen, peacemakers and human rights activists.

If a campaigner against global warming carries off the high world accolade later this month, it will accentuate a shift to reward work outside traditional peacekeeping and reinforce the link between peace and the environment.

The winner, who will take $1.5 million in prize money, will be announced in the Norwegian capital on October 12 from a field of 181 nominees.

Gore, who has raised awareness with his book and Oscar-winning documentary "An Inconvenient Truth", and Canadian Inuit activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier, who has shed light on how global warming affects Arctic peoples, were nominated to share the prize by two Norwegian parliamentarians.

"I think they are likely winners this year," said Stein Toennesson, director of Oslo's International Peace Research Institute (PRIO) and a long-time Nobel Peace Prize watcher.

"It will certainly be tempting to the (Nobel) committee to have two North Americans -- one the activist that personifies the struggle against climate change, raising awareness, and the other who represents some of the victims of climate change."

Jan Egeland, head of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, agreed the award committee could establish the link between peace and the environment.

"I think the whole issue of climate change and the environment will come at some point and reflect in the prize," Egeland told reporters last week.


"There are already climate wars unfolding ... And the worst area for that is the Sahel belt in Africa."

There has been a shift to reward work away from the realm of conventional peacemaking and human rights work.

In 2004, Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Maathai won for her campaign to get women to plant trees across Africa. Last year's prize went to Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus and his Grameen Bank for their efforts to lift millions out of poverty through a system of tiny loans.

Egeland, of course, is the idiot who suggested we talk to al Qaeda, is an anti-Semitic creep who loves Hamas, hates Israel, and called Americans stingy after we opened our wallets to support tsunami relief.

No doubt Gore would be happy to accept this "honor" from a schmuck like Egeland.

Still, there's a chance the blowhard may not get it, but it would still go to some U.N. hacks anyway.

Toennesson said by giving the award to those fighting climate change, the committee would thrust itself into the public debate ahead of a key U.N. climate conference in Bali, Indonesia, in December.

If Gore is seen as too political, the committee could opt instead for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) -- the scientists who advise the United Nations and produce key reports on the climate problem, Toennesson said.

Nothing like receiving awards for junk science.