Tuesday, November 17, 2009

'It's Crazy -- Unethical, Really'

Somehow I suspect Nancy Pelosi will not be subjected to such guidelines. She's one of the elites. The rest of you women out there?

You're expendable.
Women in their 40s should stop routinely having annual mammograms and older women should cut back to one scheduled exam every other year, an influential federal task force has concluded, challenging the use of one of the most common medical tests.

In its first reevaluation of breast cancer screening since 2002, the independent government-appointed panel recommended the changes, citing evidence that the potential harm to women having annual exams beginning at age 40 outweighs the benefit.

Coming amid a highly charged national debate over health-care reform and simmering suspicions about the possibility of rationing medical services, the recommendations immediately became enveloped in controversy.
It's all about money, boys and girls. Can you say rationed healthcare? You know you can.
Several patient advocacy groups and many breast cancer experts welcomed the new guidelines, saying they represent a growing recognition that more testing, exams and treatment are not always beneficial and, in fact, can harm patients. Mammograms produce false-positive results in about 10 percent of cases, causing anxiety and often prompting women to undergo unnecessary follow-up tests, sometimes-disfiguring biopsies and unneeded treatment, including surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.

But the American Cancer Society, the American College of Radiology and other experts condemned the change, saying the benefits of routine mammography have been clearly demonstrated and play a key role in reducing the number of mastectomies and the death toll from one of the most common cancers.

"Tens of thousands of lives are being saved by mammography screening, and these idiots want to do away with it," said Daniel B. Kopans, a radiology professor at Harvard Medical School. "It's crazy -- unethical, really."
How long until Kopans is audited and accused of being in the pocket of some interest group. I figure by the end of the day.

I wonder who'll be running the death panels that will tell elderly women they can't have a mammogram? It'll also be interesting to see the reaction of those alleged "women's rights" groups out there. Will they sell their souls and health to the government?

No comments: